tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-375644092024-03-14T06:54:40.351+00:00Inside my HeadUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger143125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37564409.post-28536988317813206272009-07-16T17:12:00.001+00:002009-07-16T17:12:24.899+00:00Afghanistan: Common Ignorance and Misconceptions.<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>This is the first time Britain has been involved in a war in Afghanistan - Wrong.<br/><br/>The current war in Afghanistan is actually just one of four wars that Britain has instigated there:<br/>1842 - Britain lost.<br/>1880 - Britain lost.<br/>1919 - Britain lost.<br/><br/>Afghan women now experience greater freedom, equality and more rights than ever before - Wrong.<br/><br/>By the late 1980s half of all university students in communist Afghanistan were women, and women made up 40 percent of the country’s doctors, 70 percent of its teachers, and 30 percent of its civil servants. Afghan woman, Saira Noorani, a female surgeon who escaped the Taliban in 2001, described her experience as such: “Every girl could go to high school and university. We could go where we wanted and wear what we liked. We used to go to cafes and the cinema to see the latest Indian movies. It all started to go wrong when the Mujahideen started winning. They used to kill teachers and burn schools. It was sad to think that these were the people the West had supported.”<br/><br/>The Mujahideen (later to become the Taliban) arose as a response to the hostile invasion by the Soviet Union - Wrong.<br/><br/>The Mujahideen did not arise in response to a hostile Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, but rather the Soviet Union intervened at the request of the Afghan government in response to the instability being wrought by a US funded and armed insurgency. An initial $500 million was allocated by the USA, money used to arm and train the rebels in the art of insurgency in secret camps set up specifically for the task across the border in Pakistan. And so began a campaign of murder and terror which started 6 months prior to the Soviet intervention. One of the reasons why the USSR invaded Afghanistan incidentally was to combat terrorists, like US funded Osama Bin Laden.<br/><br/>There is no oil in Afghanistan so the war can have nothing to do with oil - Wrong.<br/><br/>The collapse of the Soviet Union meant that the huge deposits of crude oil located in the Caspian Basin were now up for grabs. What US and Western energy corporations required was a pipeline to transport this crude to the nearest friendly port from where it could be shipped out. Iran wasn’t an option, which left Afghanistan as the only viable alternative; with the proposed pipeline to pass through and on into Pakistan to the port of Karachi on the coast of the Arabian Sea. There still is no such pipeline, yet.<br/><br/>The Taliban have never been to Disneyworld - Wrong.<br/><br/>In 1996 not only did the Taliban go to Disneyworld, Florida, they were invited. Despite ruling a country in which women were stoned to death for adultery, in which men were tortured and had their limbs amputated for misdemeanour crimes, in which music and television was banned, in which it was illegal for girls to attend school, high-ranking representatives of the Taliban were given the red-carpet treatment, put up in a five-star hotel and even accorded a VIP visit to Disneyworld. The purpose of the trip was to discuss the construction of a pipeline with US oil companies in the state of Texas where the governor at the time was none other than future president George W. Bush. After they left it was felt that they could not be trusted (whether they is the US or the Taliban I feel matters little) and the plan for the pipeline was shelved.<br/><br/>The Taliban is now less popular than ever among Afghans - Wrong.<br/><br/>The opposite may well be true. It is important to remember that prior to the latest invasion in 2001 the Taliban was far from a secure government, it was after all fighting a civil war at the time. Indeed it is not a too great a stretch to say millions of pounds a day of UK Exchequer spending has succeeded in rescuing the Taliban from their death bed and turning them into the de facto national liberation movement in Afghanistan.<br/><br/>This should be read alongside this article by Socialist Unity. <a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' onmousedown='UntrustedLink.bootstrap($(this), "edf60cfd75a9bc3bef8c412da2bef1de", event)' href='http://www.socialistunity.com/?p=4378'><span>http://www.socialistunity.</span><wbr/><span class='word_break'/>com/?p=4378</a><br/><br/>Also check out this Anti-War Coalition video: <a class='postlink' href='http://www.socialistunity.com/?p=4382'>http://www.socialistunity.com/?p=4382</a><br/><br/>Oh and this transcript from a commons defence debate last week: <a class='postlink' href='http://www.theyworkforyou.com/whall/?id=2009-07-08a.286.1'>http://www.theyworkforyou.com/whall/?id=2009-07-08a.286.1</a><br/><br/><div class='zemanta-pixie'><img src='http://img.zemanta.com/pixy.gif?x-id=ac4f737b-377d-86b8-adbb-881717b969a3' class='zemanta-pixie-img'/></div></div>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37564409.post-72812069376378716102009-05-22T01:01:00.001+00:002009-05-22T01:01:29.575+00:00Socialism, Opposition and Democracy.<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>There is nothing bad or wrong with socialism, but I will accept that in the past cases it has failed. But in every single case there has been a common factor. Opposition. "The meaning of peace is the absence of opposition to socialism." - Marx.<br/><br/>Soviet Russia is a classic example. From day one there was opposition to the Bolshevik regime. The civil war, the threat from Nazi Germany, the cold war. It meant that government policy was always based around survival. The methods introduced during the civil war were key in ensuring victory, but these very meas corrupted the end. The goal was to build a socialist paradise, but by repressing the people, the only way they thought that this was achievable due to the threat from the opposition, they destroyed that very aim. "Men make their own history, but they do not make it as they please." - Marx.<br/><br/> And what was the cause of the opposition in the first place? The undemocratic nature through which the Bolsheviks came to power. <br/>"Democracy is the road to socialism." - Marx.<br/><br/>All this highlights the essential role that democracy must play in establishing socialism. Socialism is only as bad as it's advocates. "Socialism's only weakness is it's supporters." - Orwell.<br/><br/>“Democracy is the wholesome and pure air without which a socialist public organization cannot live a full-blooded life.” - Mikhail Gorbachev<br/><br/><div class='zemanta-pixie'><img src='http://img.zemanta.com/pixy.gif?x-id=56fd3bd8-e7a4-8d3e-9cc8-f9f5b2016714' class='zemanta-pixie-img'/></div></div>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37564409.post-67947300395380745242009-02-28T00:51:00.001+00:002009-02-28T00:51:27.833+00:00It's been a while<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'><img width='377' height='513' src='http://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/photoshops.png' alt='http://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/photoshops.png' style='cursor: -moz-zoom-in;'/><br/><br/><i>(http://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/photoshops.png)</i><br/></div>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37564409.post-58832957356459752572008-10-30T03:49:00.002+00:002008-10-30T05:25:16.053+00:00Unexplainable?<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><img src="http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1397/1409477715_9c72570af9.jpg?v=0" style="max-width: 800px; width: 437px; height: 387px;" /></div>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37564409.post-89506489245779047442008-10-27T17:00:00.001+00:002008-10-27T17:00:23.290+00:00Is Keynes the key?<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>So I was wondering when, if at all, Gordon Brown would announce a rise in public spending, and last week he did just that. Of course the circumstances aren't ideal, national debt is higher than it should be already which will limit the impact, but I believe it's a step in the right direction. The Tories of course are against it - a big step by them towards fiscal conservatism - but then they're hardly going to agree with GB especially when it's so easy to make Keynesianism sound ludicrous if you word it in a certain way.<br/><br/>So for you who have no idea how Keynesianism works let me give you the truth before the Tories get to you.<br/><br/>The idea is that you decrease debt during economic booms and increase it during busts. Increasing public spending is suppose to cause the economy to recover, and would be more effective if GB hadn't let debt rise again after reducing it after 1997. Then once the economy has recovered you decrease debt.<br/><br/><br/></div>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37564409.post-47783921526296267612008-10-08T13:44:00.001+00:002008-10-08T13:45:37.063+00:00Stumbleholic<a href="http://www.matchspecial.com/quizzes/addictionSU.php" style="background: transparent url(http://www.matchspecial.com/quizzes/images/addictionResult.png) no-repeat scroll 0% 0%; color: rgb(53, 53, 53); text-decoration: none; display: block; width: 286px; height: 128px; padding-top: 50px; padding-left: 17px; -moz-background-clip: -moz-initial; -moz-background-origin: -moz-initial; -moz-background-inline-policy: -moz-initial; font-family: Times New Roman,sans-serif; font-size: 30px;">66%</a><p>This quiz was provided by - <a href="http://www.matchspecial.com/">Match Special</a></p>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37564409.post-91547230620042370062008-10-01T12:55:00.002+00:002008-10-08T13:46:01.339+00:00So I was busy procrastinatingSo I was busy procrastinating this afternoon when I stumbled across this:<br /><a href="http://undistraction.com/">undistraction.com</a><br />Priceless!Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37564409.post-60031526433405808802008-09-30T22:58:00.001+00:002008-09-30T22:59:46.292+00:00A sign of things to come<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://img.zoso.ro/cache/01/634.jpg_450.jpg"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer; width: 320px;" src="http://img.zoso.ro/cache/01/634.jpg_450.jpg" alt="" border="0" /></a>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37564409.post-85360879244272176252008-09-30T19:36:00.005+00:002008-10-01T12:30:03.328+00:00Democracy Doesn't Work!There are two fatal flaws with democracy which are particularly evident and all the more troublesome in this modern age.<br /><br />Firstly there is what is commonly called "party politics". Democracy of course is based upon representative suffrage, which means that any government must first be elected in order to take power. Whoever gets the most MPs, delegates etc. wins. The politicians that the electorate votes for are ambitious people, there's little denying it, and as a result they strive to win as many seats as possible - after all it's no fun being the opposition. They want real, affective power. This is the root of the first problem. Power. They say that power corrupts, but I suggest that it is in fact the prospect of gaining or losing it that is truly corrupting. To understand what I'm getting at one must first understand what it is I mean by corruption. I'm not referring to any legally criminal act of some description, rather the corruption of democracy. Democracy is supposed to offer the people what they want. But what they get is a series of changes and suggestion of change that the politicians believe will make them popular - and remember, popularity is power. When you consider that Barack Obama and David Cameron are likely to become two of the most powerful men in the world, men of little substance and no true conviction, that feed purely off the unpopularity of current government, is it not obvious that there is a serious problem with the democratic process?<br /><br />In this fight for popularity the voter is stuck with the dilemma of what party not to vote for. Take the current situation in the UK. Labour is in power and they offer, every now and then, some small changes and the the opposition, the Conservatives, offer some not so dissimilar policies and we end up with two powerful parties which are essentially the same - a restricting unprogressive middle ground. What great reform or achievement has any UK government had since the establishment of the NHS - in 50 years? Where's the variety? Where's the choice? Does it really make any difference who the voters elect?<br /><br />The third party in this scenario is the Liberal Democrats. This party is the only party that currently offers a<span style="font-style: italic;"> real alternative</span>. Many Lib Dems are calling for a more representative system that would probably give them more influence and political clout. They claim that this will offer the voters with the afore mentioned alternative from the unprogressive middle ground. Though perhaps proportional representation will gain the Lib Dems more power I doubt that it will offer an alternative. As I mentioned before potential power corrupts. Why will the Lib Dems stand by their current convictions? If they are placed in a position of power why would they risk it in the search of providing the people with real policies that may be unpopular? What would set them apart from the MPs of Labour and the Tories? They will strive to preserve their power as much as the others and as a result they will resort to the same strategy of offering similar policies and attacking their oppositions. Is this lack of choice and impossibility of reform what we consider to be democracy, where nothing ever changes? Where nothing ever improves unless it is the result of a global economic boom and not government?<br /><br />The second flaw is the electorate itself. The people believe that matters of government are their concern, when in fact it is not - at least not in practical theory. Members of Parliament and delegates are elected as the peoples representatives in Parliament and Congress respectively. They are chosen to make the informed decisions for the people. It's their job to understand legislation and reform in order to ensure that it's the correct action to take, so that the people don't have to. But a problem has developed, perhaps due to the growth in media, where what the people think has become too important. Again in the hunt for popularity politicians listen to the people and the people demand to be listened to. But the question must be asked why it is the people should really be listened to when it is the politicians who are the informed and make it there business to understand legislation? What does the population know of economics, foreign affairs and domestic policy etc.? A good demonstration of this was the Lisbon Treaty. In the UK many people called for a national referendum on this important EU reform. But why should it be necessary when parliament is the representative of the people elected to make exactly these kind of decisions? The people are too interfering and as a result the government is crippled by what is and isn't popular amongst the population.<br /><br />The people claim that PM Gordon Brown has ruined the British economy. But when you ask them what it was exactly that he did wrong, few are able to offer an answer. Is his unpopularity justified? Congress, scared of the risk of being unpopular, rejected the $700 billion "bail-out". But what do the American people know of economics? And the media, perhaps a third problem with modern democracy, only exacerbates this.<br /><br />These are the reasons that modern democracy doesn't work. This is why we are stuck in a frozen state of affairs with no reform. The most worrying thing of all though is that there may be no way out, bar some sort of catastrophic international crisis.<br /><br /><embed src="http://www.236.com/video/shareplayer.swf?videoID=1762088220&permalink=/d/?video=1762088220&width=425&height=364&embedCode=http://www.236.com/video/shareplayer.php?v=1762088220&tags=Original+Video&urlPath=/d/?video=&translatorSwf=http://www.236.com/video/xml_translator.swf&xmlURL=http://iacas.adbureau.net/xtserver/site=236.com/aamsz=300x250video/area=video2/frmt=0/frmt=1/frmt=16/lnid=-1/ttID=1762088220/cue=post/cgm=0/RANDOM=0000000000&roll=post&policyFile=http://www.236.com/video/adPolicy.xml&title=+" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" name="flashObj" seamlesstabbing="false" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" swliveconnect="true" allowfullscreen="true" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/shockwave/download/index.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash" width="425" height="364"></embed>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37564409.post-3534711604824188972008-09-30T19:17:00.001+00:002008-09-30T19:17:58.133+00:00"If I had a nickel..."<span class="quote">"If I had a quarter for every time I said I had a nickel, I would have five times as much theoretical money."<br /> - Stephen Colbert<br /></span>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37564409.post-10408498881382518212008-09-19T17:45:00.000+00:002008-09-19T17:47:29.248+00:00"These AREN'T the droids you're looking for"<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'><img width='416' height='286' src='http://tag.angryminority.com/post-images/2762458387_31207c1a81.jpg' style='max-width: 800px;'/></div>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37564409.post-64912432468586298712008-06-25T00:15:00.002+00:002008-06-25T00:25:04.451+00:00You can make your own women driver jokes here<span style="font-size:100%;"><b>Gear mistake flattens sports car</b><br /></span><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <span style="font-size:100%;"><br /> Police are investigating a crash in which a £30,000 jeep ended upparked on top of two other cars, one of them a Porsche sports car worth <b>up to £45,000. </b><br /><br /><br />It happened at about 1700 BST in the car park of the Co-Op supermarket on Belfast's Lisburn Road.<br /></span> <p><span style="font-size:100%;"> It is believed the female driver may have mistakenly put the automatic jeep into drive instead of reverse.<br /><br /> When she accelerated, the car mounted the Porsche and a Toyota Celica which were parked directly in front of her.<br /><br />The Porsche Boxster was damaged on its wing and bonnet, while the Toyota Celica was crushed.<br /><br /><br /> One person, believed to be the Porsche driver, was taken to hospital.<br /><br /> His injuries are not believed to be life-threatening<br /><br /><br /> Dominic Montague, who works in a nearby coffee shop, saw the aftermath of the crash.</span> </p><p><span style="font-size:100%;">"I saw the woman who drove the jeep and she just looked befuddled, she couldn't really understand what was going on - which is probably understandable enough if you drove a car out over two other cars," he said.<br /><br /> The BBC spoke to the driver of the Toyota, but he said he was "not in the mood to give interviews".<br /></span> </p><p><span style="font-size:100%;"><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/media/images/44776000/jpg/_44776227_a2ae64fc-ba52-42ab-bdba-6802365e91d1.jpg"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer; width: 320px;" src="http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/media/images/44776000/jpg/_44776227_a2ae64fc-ba52-42ab-bdba-6802365e91d1.jpg" alt="" border="0" /></a></span></p><p><span style="font-size:100%;"><br /></span></p><p><span style="font-size:100%;"><br /></span></p><p><span style="font-size:100%;"><br /></span></p><p><span style="font-size:100%;"><br /></span></p><p><span style="font-size:100%;"><br /></span></p><p><span style="font-size:100%;"><br /></span></p><p><span style="font-size:100%;">Story from BBC NEWS:<br /></span></p><span style="font-size:100%;">http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/1/hi/northern_ireland/7472490.stm<br /><br />Published: 2008/06/24 22:07:53 GMT</span><br /></div>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37564409.post-14559533659940196732008-06-17T14:43:00.001+00:002008-06-17T14:43:27.394+00:00This video is hilarious. Watch it. Watch it now!<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'><div class='youtube-video'><object width='425' height='355'><param value='http://www.youtube.com/v/APzfmlc5oBk' name='movie'> </param><param value='transparent' name='wmode'> </param><embed width='425' height='355' wmode='transparent' type='application/x-shockwave-flash' src='http://www.youtube.com/v/APzfmlc5oBk'> </embed> </object></div><br/><br/>Man sets off Air Bag while listening to Queen!</div>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37564409.post-87255451875564381972008-06-16T11:12:00.002+00:002008-06-16T11:17:28.792+00:00I know it's not funny but LOL!<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">(From BBC News Website)<br /><br /><div class="headline"><span style="font-weight: bold;"> Street sweep truck sucks up dog</span><br /></div> <br /> A street-sweeping truck has sucked a dog up through its bristles on a New York street, leaving its horrified owner holding nothing but th<span style="font-weight: bold;">e </span>lead.<b> </b><br /><p> Robert Machin, 57, had just<br />finished walking his two Boston terriers in the Bronx and was about to load them into his car when the truck appeared.<br /> <br />He recalls being whipped around, only to glimpse Ginger meeting her end in the sweeper's round brushes.<br /><br /> City sanitation officers described the dog's death as "rare and unfortunate".</p><p>But Mr Machin, a retired public transport worker, questioned whether the driver had been observing proper procedures.</p><p>The truck, he said, seemed to have been barrelling through the street at an unsafe speed.<b><br /></b></p><p><b>Truck chase</b></p><p>"It happened so fast," he told the New York Daily News.<br /></p><p>"It spun me around, and as it spun me around, I caught a last glimpse of her.</p><p>"I was devastated. I was completely dumbfounded and shocked. I mean, I just witnessed my dog sucked up into a street sweeper."<br /><br /> He said he had chased the truck for about two and a half blocks, shouting for the operator to stop.<br /><br /> The driver eventually came back but refused to turn off the whirring brushes that had crushed Ginger, until he arrived, the paper adds. </p><div class="bo"><p> The Department of Sanitation offered its condolences to Mr Machin and his family but added: "It is important for all New Yorkers to remember to maintain the safety of their animals while<br />walking city streets." </p><p> Ginger's master who, according to the New York Daily News, plans to contact the Humane Society and hire a lawyer, said his lost dog had been like family to him.<br /><br />"My children are all grown up," he said.<br /><br /> "These two dogs, they're my life," he added, choking back tears.<br /> <br /></p></div> <img src="http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/media/images/44750000/jpg/_44750043_ginger_ap_226body.jpg" style="max-width: 800px;" /><br /><br /><small>Ginger (centre) is seen here with two other dogs of her breed</small><br /></div>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37564409.post-5407680839038260992008-06-16T11:00:00.002+00:002008-06-16T11:01:14.069+00:00Don't you just hate Americans?<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><div class="youtube-video"><object height="355" width="425"><param value="http://www.youtube.com/v/teM4T3TylFc" name="movie"> <param value="transparent" name="wmode"> <embed wmode="transparent" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/teM4T3TylFc" height="355" width="425"></embed> </object></div><br /><br />"Why people believe Americans are Stupid"</div>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37564409.post-1449216892621956452008-06-16T10:33:00.002+00:002008-06-16T10:34:44.971+00:00How and how not to pick a name for your baby<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><img src="http://www.theselfishbastard.com/preg/12.jpg" style="max-width: 800px; width: 420px; height: 425px;" /><br /></div>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37564409.post-15978397919661825142008-06-16T10:14:00.002+00:002008-06-16T10:20:01.813+00:00Some famous photographs and events replicated in lego - Name the event/photo!<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><img src="http://1dak.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/kreativ_ot_lego_32_foto_1.jpg" style="max-width: 800px; width: 417px; height: 287px;" />1<br /><img src="http://1dak.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/kreativ_ot_lego_32_foto_3.jpg" style="max-width: 800px; width: 417px; height: 334px;" />2<br /><img src="http://1dak.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/kreativ_ot_lego_32_foto_13.jpg" style="max-width: 800px; width: 417px;" />3<br /><img src="http://1dak.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/kreativ_ot_lego_32_foto_15.jpg" style="max-width: 800px; width: 417px;" />4<br /><img src="http://1dak.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/kreativ_ot_lego_32_foto_21.jpg" style="max-width: 800px; width: 417px;" />5<br /></div>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37564409.post-91860626197502094552008-04-21T21:12:00.001+00:002008-04-21T21:12:33.353+00:00Suckers<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'><img width='317' height='409' src='http://network.news.com.au/image/0,10114,5175696,00.jpg' style='max-width: 800px;'/><br/></div>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37564409.post-61184887150914324352008-04-21T20:33:00.002+00:002008-04-21T20:36:08.999+00:00Cyanide and Happiness (You can't have one without the other)<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><img src="http://www.explosm.net/db/files/Comics/Rob/crappycomic.png" style="max-width: 800px; width: 416px; height: 158px;" /><br /></div>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37564409.post-6918254211000045722008-04-21T20:28:00.001+00:002008-04-21T20:28:28.292+00:00French Stormtroopers?<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'><img src='http://www.msu.edu/%7Ewhitero2/capn/sw13.jpg' style='max-width: 800px;'/><br/><br/>Oh dear. A little insensitive perhaps?<br/></div>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37564409.post-24823546428023808132008-04-21T19:47:00.001+00:002008-04-21T19:47:50.195+00:00Pear Computer Inc.<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'><img width='432' height='486' src='http://www.nextnature.net/research/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/better_then_the_real_thing.jpg' style='max-width: 800px;'/><br/></div>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37564409.post-12947531854354825182007-12-21T22:47:00.001+00:002007-12-21T22:47:38.823+00:00The 9 most racist disney moments<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'><a href='http://community.livejournal.com/ohnotheydidnt/18111350.html'>The 9 Most Racist Disney Characters</a><br/><br/><br/><p class='poweredbyperformancing'>Powered by <a href='http://scribefire.com/'>ScribeFire</a>.</p></div>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37564409.post-729544685730358062007-12-21T18:09:00.001+00:002007-12-21T18:09:56.117+00:00Was your morning as bad as this guy's?<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'><h1><a href='http://www.thefunnystuff.net/viewmovie.php?id=430'><small><small><small>Was your morning as bad as this guy's?</small></small></small></a></h1><br/><br/><p class='poweredbyperformancing'>Powered by <a href='http://scribefire.com/'>ScribeFire</a>.</p></div>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37564409.post-51077213350859853622007-12-21T18:03:00.001+00:002007-12-21T18:03:21.172+00:00The Does-Nothing-O-Matic<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'><a href='http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5-ddCXUeub4'>The Does-Nothing-O-Matic</a><br/><br/><br/><p class='poweredbyperformancing'>Powered by <a href='http://scribefire.com/'>ScribeFire</a>.</p></div>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37564409.post-66063684617575317312007-12-02T23:04:00.001+00:002007-12-02T23:04:12.976+00:00Absolutely Hilarious Bathroom Mirror Prank<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'><br /><font size='1'><a href='http://view.break.com/384045'>http://view.break.com/384045</a> - Watch more <a href='http://www.break.com/'>free videos</a></font><br /><br /><p class='poweredbyperformancing'>Powered by <a href='http://scribefire.com/'>ScribeFire</a>.</p></div>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0